Biological essentialism, in the context of gender differences, refers to a belief that men and women are cognitively & psychologically distinct. There is a female nature & a male nature. Whereas, in reality, we are strongly overlapping populations with much individual variation. https://twitter.com/ashishkjames99/status/999737040324345857 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think ‘essentialism’ is a bad concept myself, in that it smuggles in an assumption that there is nothing beyond immediate appearance; that is the ‘ism’ is a pejorative attached to the essence/appearance distinction. (Making no claims about gender here.)
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
My fault, I’m sure. IMHO: Mostly the arguments against biological essentialism as explanation for gender difference are good. But...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamesHeartfield @HPluckrose
... the concept of essentialism is bad. All reason is about moving from appearance to essence (with caveats). I.e. not taking first impressions uncritically. Deconstructionists (and others) argue this is a false move, which they call ‘essentialism’.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamesHeartfield @HPluckrose
To call it essentialism*ism* is not a neutral description but a pejorative. It is saying that scientific reasoning is delusional, that it is not possible to move beyond immediate appearance. The term ‘essentialism’ smuggles in a Pomo case against scientific method.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamesHeartfield
It can and often is used to make that argument but must it be? What would you call the argument that biology produces a male nature - assertive, analytical, reasoning - and a female nature - agreeable, intuitive, emotional.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I’m not an expert, but it sure sounds like some abbreviated reasoning. Having hung around in social sciences I am irked that natural scientists are so confident in asserting things about social behaviour without studying society.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It;s not scientists I've ever heard say it. They tend to understand the whole variation thing because they actually know how evolution works. It's far-right loons who don't who keep telling me this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.