Coincidentally, I am just finishing my piece on why biological essentialism is equally at odds with what we know about gender differences as blank slatism.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You ask a leading question with a strawman and personalize the question in good feminist "the personal is the politic" style tactic as if I implied anything about your specific brain and then pretend you have put away your woman card.....

-
You're now claiming you didn't say that the choice shouldn't be taken away from women & that you weren't speaking about me personally and women generally when you said 'look, she's responding emotionally, this is why I don't discuss with women?' And that this makes me a feminist?
-
I never made any such moral arguments. I made a statement of fact about biology and history. You took that as a moral argument about choice. I am saying I can't have discussion with someone who isn't interested rational conservation.
-
I was just coming to the same conclusion. I wish you better.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now if only you could be so emotionless when considering hubby going to the pub when you're in-laws visit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.