That was why I said 'we' about the universal liberals. I certainly don't claim not to be biased towards universal liberalism. That would make it hard to argue for. I thought that was a good attempt at steelmanning the IdPol position & their concerns abt the UniLib one. No? https://twitter.com/rgigger/status/998157270297948161 …
I am talking about the rationale which underlies the two approaches. I have said nothing about any prominent activist. Please stop now.
-
-
What I’m saying here is that there are vocal activists out there who fit the descriptions that you are making but I don’t think that those descriptions fit many ordinary people. Does it offend you that I’m saying that?
-
No. That is true. It is just only tangentially relevant to my discussion of two rationales for two approaches to anti-racism. Most people don't make them. The thread I was responding to involved two people who did & this was their difference which comes up time & time again.
-
You need to be gone now. If you find my points difficult to understand, I'm sorry, but I'm wasting no more of my life explaining why I don't mean things I have never said.
-
Thanks for taking the time to talk to me. I in no way meant to offend, accuse, or tax your mental health. I learned a lot from the exchange. I’m sorry that you found it so frustrating.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.