That was why I said 'we' about the universal liberals. I certainly don't claim not to be biased towards universal liberalism. That would make it hard to argue for. I thought that was a good attempt at steelmanning the IdPol position & their concerns abt the UniLib one. No? https://twitter.com/rgigger/status/998157270297948161 …
??? I don't know where you are getting this from. I will soon be writing an essay about this and perhaps this will clear it up. Both forms of anti-racism necessarily have to deal with racism and this requires addressing racial identity.
-
-
Maybe I’m asking too much here or maybe I’m parsing your words too intently but here is how I see it:
-
You say our approach is “focusing intensely on race”. I would say that other have chosen to focus on race and we are choosing to not pretend like they aren’t.https://twitter.com/hpluckrose/status/998130191561101312?s=21 …
-
Then I'm not talking about you! Please go away now. I don't want to mute you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.