That was why I said 'we' about the universal liberals. I certainly don't claim not to be biased towards universal liberalism. That would make it hard to argue for. I thought that was a good attempt at steelmanning the IdPol position & their concerns abt the UniLib one. No? https://twitter.com/rgigger/status/998157270297948161 …
I am talking about the conflict between those two positions on this. I can't help what you feel like I am saying. I did not, in reality, say that. Look at the thread again to see what I did say.
-
-
Communication is about understanding. I’m not asking you to cater to my feelings. I’m just giving you some feedback about how your words might be interpreted.
-
If you continue to use them this way you might get a lot of people inferring things you don’t mean and feeling mischaracterized and there might be better ways of saying it that avoid that confusion. That’s all I’m saying.
-
Like I could refer to the group you refer to as “universal liberals” as racial violence denialists and get upset when people “take it the wrong way” but I won’t and if I did I wouldn’t be surprised if you complained about it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.