I don't think so. When we set out what we are measuring for - gender/racial/LGBT equality - this is then fairly easy to measure. What makes people uncomfortable is the knowledge that historically much disparagement of other cultures has been racist & imperialist.https://twitter.com/SSS_music/status/995819055247323136 …
Yes, the first would be the moral measure tho and we were talking about a moral measure.
-
-
Increasing well-being isn’t an issue of morals?
-
??? That is what we base our morality on but no, you couldn't say that having greater wellbeing makes one more moral. This could be a matter of wealth. I think you have to measure ethical policies themselves. But I've said this. If you still don't see it, lets leave it.
-
I didn’t mean that HAVING greater well being makes one more moral - I meant that policies which increase well-being are more moral. How are we measuring moral/ethical policies if not on the degree to which they improve well-being?
-
Yes, and I am saying that its the policies themselves we can measure. We don't disagree on that and I have argued it many times. Can we leave it now if you still don't understand my point? I can't clarify any better than I have.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.