What I am talking about is the tendency to look at the origins and history of an idea that is plaguing us right now and make arguments about it which don't relate to what is plaguing us right now.
-
-
Show this thread
-
eg, Despite the fact that commissions into FGM in the UK unfailingly recommend that the key to getting rid of it is getting Muslim imams to denounce it, attempting to raise the issue of FGM will invariably result in a dozen ppl telling you its origins are not Islamic.
Show this thread -
Similarly, attempts to discuss the current phase of postmodernist thinking and how it is affecting society will nearly always result in people wanting to argue about the origins of these ideas. These are interesting academic explorations but not the point.
Show this thread -
If I am trying to discuss the problem of positionality - stay-in-your-lane, lived experience, my truth, sit down and shut up - I do not wish to hear about the Frankfurt School, Marx, Hegel or, most bizzarely, Plato. Please and thank you.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
History, like anything really, can be used as a tool of deflection to shift the narrative in ways that further your best interests. The real problem is academics arguing for their best interests and not for the truth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
100% agree
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.