JD showed evidence that men & women have different interests on average. Irrational ideologues claimed this meant women were biologically inferior. (WTF?!) A claim that 'women are inferior' is not inherently irrational. It is either true or untrue depending on criteria.
I don't know what the last bit means. This is way I look at it. https://areomagazine.com/2017/03/27/how-french-intellectuals-ruined-the-west-postmodernism-and-its-impact-explained/ …https://areomagazine.com/2018/02/07/no-postmodernism-is-not-dead-and-other-misconceptions/ …
-
-
Sorry that was confusing - still used to trying to cut down for 140. I guess I was looking for not as much a longer article but a discussion or debate about fuller context and history with someone w/contrary views and is more of a philosopher [as in not an activist sj type]
-
. I'm less interested in philosophical precursors to postmodernism than its key ideas and how they've evolved and are being implemented now. Stephen Hicks' Understanding Postmodernism & David Detmer's Challenging Postmodernism might be what you're looking for.
-
The history evolving into the current is the full context i was referring to in this case - thanks for the recs. i do find it more engrossing and sometimes deeper to have 2 to 4 voices contrasting and complementing each other - at least when done in mutually respectful format
-
Well, that's what I sent. You can find me responding to someone else in 'Skepticism is needed in our Post-truth Age. Postmodernism is not.'
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.