If there was evidence that black women were targeted as a class, yes, it would be illegal discrimination even if the motives for it weren't racism because black men kept their job or sexism because white women kept their jobs. It's still race and sex based discrimination.
-
-
You read the Crenshaw thing and the rulings saying that cases couldn't be judged like this which was later overturned and now they can?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Did I read the entire 31 page document you linked? No. I can tell you in the highlighted portion she has the facts of the case wrong. Black men were also laid off and were filing suit.pic.twitter.com/3CrPLU0UP4
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doublespeak152 @HPluckrose and
The court wanted to combine the cases but the plaintiffs refused because the claim that black women were being doubly discriminated against. That's what the court was responding to in the section she quotes
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes, I know. There wasn't a way to complain of that. Now there is. Is that a bad thing?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @doublespeak152 and
I'm going to leave it here. The article reported what Crenshaw did accurately. If you think this is itself is bad, think about whether you'd like to be able to complain if straight, white men get discriminated against by SocJus ppl when just one of those identities wouldn't be.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I've literally been trying to explain for hours that it ISN'T the case that you can discriminate against a subset of a protected class by narrowing parameters so it's not "racism". Never once said "it's ok if ppl can discriminate against black women". Not once
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doublespeak152 @HPluckrose and
And if you haven't read what you linked in awhile, try doing so and getting through the first few sentences without believing there's an ideological motivation for misrepresenting what occurred in the GM case
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm more concerned about the ideology than the law cases which seemed quite a strong argument. I thought you might know more about the law changes but you keep talking about something else very abstractly as tho it wasn't something that actually happened & the rationale recorded.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @doublespeak152 and
If she actually reported it incorrectly. I'd like to know but I think someone would have said so in all these years because she has a lot of critics. She's not wrong to say all the black women were laid off because black men were too because both of those things that can be true.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But lets leave it because we've been talking past each other all along. I accept that you have no ideological motivation for saying the article reported the case wrong.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.