I missed it too! Here I am, still on the left, still not evaluating people by their race, gender or sexuality, still thinking that's fairly integral to liberalism...https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/993555036356526083 …
This is what we argued here. I agree with you. https://areomagazine.com/2017/08/22/a-manifesto-against-the-enemies-of-modernity/ … I thought that was clear when I said I missed the memo about the left needing to judge people on race, gender, sexuality etc. I'm left and I don't. I am not alone.
-
-
I’ll read it. But people on the Left don’t judge people based on one’s prioritized identity. Acknowledging differences unique to those differences isn’t resulting in an existential polarization. I find these arguments to be massive straw mans
-
Some do, I'm afraid. Acknowledging differences and opposing discrimination is the right way to do it. Putting people in tiny stereotyped boxes and claiming they have knowledge suited to their caste is not.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Okay, I’ve read your piece. I’ll share my views, as there are flaws throughout.
-
Lets first touch on “objective truths.” Outside of mathematics, affirming an objective truth can be, well, sticky. Me and you see a tree, but from different vantage points, thus, are can objectively say that it is an objective truth that there is a tree in front of us. 1.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Yes, this is not denied by anyone.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.