I think there are tons of layers to it.
-
-
I mean I’m sure there are people who have had little success in their relationships with women who recognize that getting themselves together will help that, but the idea that it’s just to get laid missed the point and message entirely. It’s more about getting a wife.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jkspradlin @MitchHeaslip and
You might want to question the motives of atheists who attack Peterson. Just sayin' -- maybe there's an agenda there.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Tigerlore88 @jkspradlin and
yes, its a gigantic atheist plot to overthrow, rob and enslave peterson fanboys for their apostacy from objective truth and modernism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @njroode @Tigerlore88 and
Ironically, it’s objective truth and modernism that I think Peterson is selling.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jkspradlin @njroode and
From Maps of Meaning.pic.twitter.com/MVn7yXmJ3I
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @jkspradlin and
Doesn't this say that accurate, objective knowledge challenged the mythological worldview because it was wrong about the nature of the objective world? I don't see what I'm supposed to take issue with here.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SelfEngineer @jkspradlin and
No. It says that that it did that but that that was bad (pathological) because objective knowledge is essentially a social construct conveyed in language (note scare quotes around 'objective') and the 'reality' of the mythic world and emotion (affective) was undervalued.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @jkspradlin and
When he says it "challenged the belief in the reality of the mythic world", doesn't that mean it challenged people's ability to believe that it is true? If by "this tendency" he means objectivity I agree with you but I don't agree that he thinks it's "essentially" a social
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SelfEngineer @HPluckrose and
costruct - he does say it is accurate. I think “it was bad” is not exactly what he thinks. He would probably say that despite the good it has caused, it also had negative consequences that have not been adequately addressed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, he doesn't. He's not shy about this. See Harris podcast. He consistently argues against truth as defined by evidence and for truth as defined by usefulness and myths. Many people do say that and they're right. Peterson doesnt. His argument is for epistemological pragmatism.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @jkspradlin and
I agree with the first part of your tweet, although what I meant was that he called it accurate in the picture of Maps of Meaning you tweeted. The second part I disagree with. Although he does argue for epistemological pragmatism, I know with 76.37% certainty that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SelfEngineer @HPluckrose and
he actually does say that as well.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.