Yes, but someone who made a deliberate choice to ensure that was all that was on offer in the full knowledge of western repugnance for this when other meat was more cheaply & readily available, you might question their motives.https://twitter.com/coffeelance/status/993165686821109760 …
-
-
Replying to @GrowTheFuckUp66
I think it is. Most people neither know nor care if their meat is Halal. It tastes the same. It would need to be something the average Brit found morally or emotionally repugnant. If a country where dog was standard chose it particularly to put British homeless ppl in a dilemma
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GrowTheFuckUp66
It is. I have written about it. 10% of it is done without stunning and this is the ethical issue.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrowTheFuckUp66
When I researched it, 15% of meat was Halal while only 5% of the population is Muslim. I also looked at where the certification money goes. I do see the problem but I still think it is categorically different.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Maybe some people do have a deep moral & emotional objection to halal food & would be in a real quandary about whether or not to eat it whilst homeless & hungry but I think most would not. Something more viscerally alien & disgusting needs to be substituted. I think dog wld do it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.