Yes, but someone who made a deliberate choice to ensure that was all that was on offer in the full knowledge of western repugnance for this when other meat was more cheaply & readily available, you might question their motives.https://twitter.com/coffeelance/status/993165686821109760 …
-
-
...when other meat was at least as cheaply available and then said, as people have here, 'If you're hungry enough, you'll eat it. If you can complain, you're not that hungry,' I'd consider it petty and spiteful.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is. I have written about it. 10% of it is done without stunning and this is the ethical issue.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
When I researched it, 15% of meat was Halal while only 5% of the population is Muslim. I also looked at where the certification money goes. I do see the problem but I still think it is categorically different.
-
Maybe some people do have a deep moral & emotional objection to halal food & would be in a real quandary about whether or not to eat it whilst homeless & hungry but I think most would not. Something more viscerally alien & disgusting needs to be substituted. I think dog wld do it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.