No. Feminists are attempting to demonise men and pathologise masculinity. Violent criminals who are mostly male include women among their victims. Also, 'violent criminals exist so it's OK to be bigoted about half the population' is an incoherent stance to take.https://twitter.com/DeepEcologyAU/status/992201049766150144 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @moolecular
Until we admit there is something about men which makes them more likely to commit violent crime than women, we cannot begin to tackle the problem. Is it only some men? Or do all men have it in varying degrees? We won’t know if people prevent us from investigating.
8 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
You've started by ignoring half the population, when there are plenty of violent women as well, even if a smaller percentage, and fewer that make the news (or that people do more than laugh about when they do, for whatever reasons). I'm guessing there are many causes, some...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @catovitch @l3onx and
...affecting both men and women, some mostly affecting one and not the other. But to start by ignoring half of them doesn't seem like a good plan if you really want to get to the bottom of causes. That's starting with a conclusion.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Whatever causes violence, men have more of it. Do you agree?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, men are more likely to take on both positive & negative roles involving violence so they are the majority of soldiers & jobs involving physical protection & the majority of violent criminals. This ratio is consistent among all the great apes.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.