He's not allowed to have feelings of hurt because he's a man. Meanwhile, any feelings a woman or racial or sexual minority has in response to any action of a person perceived as privileged are immediately legitimate & the privileged person must take responsibility for them.
I'm calling a specific epistemology which works on standpoint theory an epistemology. What do you think I'm calling an epistemology?
-
-
I am saying that we *shouldn't* keep saying 'postmodernism' when we mean a certain set of ideas based on an epistemology of situated knowledge. Because postmodernism is much broader than this. I have just argued this in my response to the defence of postmodernism.
-
Go back to the first tweet I responded to. Postmodernism isn't an epistemology. You ask a postmodernist, "How do you know that" and they say because I'm a postmodernist, then that's a statement of identity not an epistemology, and that should be pointed out.
-
That is also what my tweet is saying. That postmodernism is not an epistemology and therefore should not be used to describe one. Therefore there is no need to explain to me that postmodernism isn't an epistemology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.