Currently getting: "The detailed fact-based, reasoned argument of this article is invalid because some completely different people who support the same thing say crazy things instead' and "This article is invalid because it was hosted by someone I don't like.'
-
-
-
Replying to @Auto_Math @HPluckrose
As long as these replies are included. You painting the argument for trans rights in a positive light does not get round the fact that those actually advising the government on trans rights push that any dissent from their dogma is transphobia.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RogSat @Auto_Math
Jesus. You said this 100 times. I agreed that that is bad 100 times. That doesn't mean that every other article and discussion on the subject is invalid. You can't just keep saying 'But the core issue is that authoritarian loons exist' to absolutely everything. It's pointless.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
My own article addresses the authoritarian loons at length. We AGREED that this is bad. So, many. times. There is more to the conversation and if you won't consider any of it but keep repeating the same thing that we've already agreed on, of course I get bored.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.