Sounds like a trans activist but isn't. Rather than 'use penis-haver because not everyone with a penis is a man', it's 'use penis-haver because this dehumanises men and that's a good thing.'https://twitter.com/GabeBlessing/status/986451388745084931 …
-
-
They exist and appear to be pretty mainstream in trans activist chat... I wouldn't group them with MRAs - but it's a fair point to say forcing "self ID" as legally enforceable "womanhood" is a real threat to womens rights & womens spaces.
-
Some trans people very much disagree with this.
-
I'm sure they do but this says nothing about the validity of the argument.
-
The argument is invalid because "trans women are women and there is no debate" is nonsensical. It leads to lesbians being called transphobes for their sexual preferences, and women's spaces having no discretion but to let trans women into their spaces.
-
I see. Amazing how arguments can be invalid for things they never said. Your argument is invalid because 'hijab is empowering' is nonsensical & leads to pressure on women. Please stop this now, Roger. If you won't read articles or respond to what is actually being said, no point
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.