Sounds like a trans activist but isn't. Rather than 'use penis-haver because not everyone with a penis is a man', it's 'use penis-haver because this dehumanises men and that's a good thing.'https://twitter.com/GabeBlessing/status/986451388745084931 …
There is some ideologising about this but to suggest it targets women specifically and is systematic and widespread is also ideologising.
-
-
Also very weird to imply it’s somehow a crusade being led by brutish misogynistic men to call women ovary-havers. Like it’s MRAs pushing trans-rights political correctness
-
@HPluckrose Wait a minute there: what about the trans activists who actually do abuse women for having ovaries & vaginas? Straight-up science denial seems to be at the core of much trans activism.https://terfisaslur.com/erasing-female-biology/ … -
They exist and are nuts. This doesn't make them MRAs.
-
They exist and appear to be pretty mainstream in trans activist chat... I wouldn't group them with MRAs - but it's a fair point to say forcing "self ID" as legally enforceable "womanhood" is a real threat to womens rights & womens spaces.
-
Some trans people very much disagree with this.
-
I'm sure they do but this says nothing about the validity of the argument.
-
The argument is invalid because "trans women are women and there is no debate" is nonsensical. It leads to lesbians being called transphobes for their sexual preferences, and women's spaces having no discretion but to let trans women into their spaces.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.