OK, tweeps, here we go. I will be responding to this shortly. Pls read with an open mind. This is a good faith perspective on benefits of postmodernism from someone who sees the problem with what many (but not he) call the postmodern left. I disagree with his take on it, ofc.https://twitter.com/AreoMagazine/status/985725463778639872 …
-
-
With respect, this seems unreasonable and a poor assumption for an article defending it. I have studied discourse analysis and social constructivism during my phd and there are as many theories as there are Pomo academics. It's opaque and convoluted.
-
Yes, I addressed that in my piece. It is better to see critics of postmodernism as working backwards from specific problems to their cause. We do need a better name for people who still seem confused about what is being criticised.
@thesadredearth suggested 'New Logocentrism.; -
That might be one of the best discussion and analysis of post modernism I have ever read. You do an excellent job of offering definitions and broad differences which really helped.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.