It's more that it makes the usual defences better than most do and has some original ones and comes from someone who is honest & thoughtful. I'm sure you'll see the problems immediately. I look forward to addressing them tho.
-
-
I liked it. But it may be improving PoMo by saying: 1. Post-modernism is limited to where modernism is dominant 2. In situations where modernism isn’t dominant you can apply the same tools to whatever the dominant ideology is So it becomes more like: post-dominant-ideology-ism
-
And presumably could equally be applied to, say intersectionality which as a competing (and in some contexts dominant) ideology is creating it’s own power dynamics as it tries to deconstruct the existing ones.
-
Also, I bet that whatever post-modernism is doing right it can be done even better with good data and analysis. If society sets up power relationships in ways that are hard to perceive. I should be able to measure something to show this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.