But it’s directly addressing the disconnect itself from a good faith position which makes it extremely valuable.
-
-
-
Yes! Thank you. That is exactly what its value is. It opens up discussion between honest people with different perceptions of pomos role.
-
I liked it. But it may be improving PoMo by saying: 1. Post-modernism is limited to where modernism is dominant 2. In situations where modernism isn’t dominant you can apply the same tools to whatever the dominant ideology is So it becomes more like: post-dominant-ideology-ism
-
And presumably could equally be applied to, say intersectionality which as a competing (and in some contexts dominant) ideology is creating it’s own power dynamics as it tries to deconstruct the existing ones.
-
Also, I bet that whatever post-modernism is doing right it can be done even better with good data and analysis. If society sets up power relationships in ways that are hard to perceive. I should be able to measure something to show this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.