No, because I hate this topic. The argument is that everything comes down to 'is' in the end because everything, including our morality is biologically based. But it's just too complicated and multi-faceted to trace everything back and we have to make arguments instead abt ought.
I don't know what you mean? What would make it more normative? That's like saying 'If eyes evolved by natural selection, how can they be normative?' They are. We can see them. They're universal apart barring disability. We can see the prefrontal cortex where morality evolved too.
-
-
There will always be a criminal element and they will try to except themselves from moral requirements laid down by the society. But I'm not sure why you think this wouldn't be the case if morality came from elsewhere. Criminals do exist wherever it came from. That is a fact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.