Postmodernism: Objective truth is unattainable. Knowledge is always situated. Religion: Objective truth is found in my religion & accepted via faith, Science: Objective truth is attainable in principle & attaining it is the aim but it is always provisional & open to correction.https://twitter.com/afterall_net/status/985533728381259776 …
They're not looking for disconfirming evidence that God exists, that he had a son etc. Might squabble over interpretation of minutiae. But i am not interested in arguing about existence of God. I did that for too long. So over it. Boring and unproductive.
-
-
God is unfalsifiable and thus inherently unscientific. There is no percentage in arguing about God's existence. There is therefore no "correcting" to be done.
-
That's how I feel, yes. Until there is evidence and some way to make him or any other mythic intangible thing falsifiable, there is no reason to consider it a serious proposition. It can't be claimed to exist. It's boring to argue about.
-
Sorry for the delayed reply. I've been in Twitter's bad books. Uh, something can be a serious proposition without being scientific.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.