It says that Catharine MacKinnon asks, 'If women were something, would the men closest to them beat them to death?' and claims that by raising this question McKinnan makes the case that women are not considered to be human. Even if the answer is quite clearly 'no?'
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is what I love about
#CGJung. Finding Jung decades ago was clarifying for me when I pondered similar issues. In short, masculinity (as an archetypal energy) has a positive pole and a negative pole. Every archetype has a positive and a negative aspect. Everything belongs. -
I got into him in relation to the meanings of tarot cards!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Still don't understand how women whose life goal seems to be "I will spend the bulk of my days and nights detailing things that are wrong with men" can't see how destructive THAT is.
-
Yes, although, sadly, a man wrote this.
-
Ha! That's even worse. And that's what I get for assuming.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Symbolic Genocide. Crivens, that's a thing now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aha. Finally something that could get you to cal out to Christ. ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would rather poke my eye out with a fork.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pschoanalysis is a religion combined with a pyramid scheme.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Published on machines created by man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.