Yes, if you were talking about an aspect of your faith & someone comes in & says this depends on a truth claim that God exists so you must prove it to them, you can say 'GTFO.' If however, you are making an argument that God exists, evidence is required to be taken seriouslyhttps://twitter.com/SteveMundie/status/984879772068130817 …
-
-
God’s exstence is only an issue in debate when it’s the premise of any conclusion. Christian’s need to learn to support their moral positions without reference to supernatural forces when discussing things in general society. Enlightenment thinkers did it better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
First 2 people would need to agree on "What is God." Then it is easier to dialogue about the usefulness & literalness of The Ineffable's existence. Although, without a charitable consideration from the unbeliever, it still won't go far. Personal experience is the most convincing.
-
It is like learning about feminism. The learner must consider the points of the feminist charitably to further communication. To expect everyone who isn't a feminist to first require you to prove the validity of the feminist perspective is going to make communication very slow.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.