My main problem with the is/ought confusion is when I make an argument about what we should do and people seem to think I am saying this is what we're doing. No. If it were, I wouldn't need to make arguments about it.
-
-
The liberal left is currently divided on whether it should prioritise criticising the right or getting its own house in order & trying to oust the extreme identitarian loons.
Show this thread -
Those who argue for the former believe that we need to unify against a common enemy and that dissent in the ranks can only divide and weaken the left. They can become angry & suspicious of the motivations of those of us who criticise our own side.
Show this thread -
Those who argue for prioritising getting our own house in order think that this is the only way to present a credible enough opposition to the right and the issues that concern us that reasonable liberals can get on board with.
Show this thread -
This relates to the psychology recognised in the fear that if that Muslim reformists are seen to be trying to get their own house in order, people will feel somewhat reassured that the problem is acknowledged and back away from existential threat reactions of banning a whole grp.
Show this thread -
Isn't this true? If you are someone who sees a problem within Islam, are you more reassured by Muslims who tell you it doesn't exist and quite possibly that you're racist for thinking it does or by Muslims who tell you they see it and are on it?
Show this thread -
In the same way, lefties who say criticisms of extreme identitarian and authoritarian leftism are unwarranted and probably motivated by bigotry are less likely to reassure waverers than those of us who say, 'Yep, this exists. It's a problem. It doesn't define us & we are on it'
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.