Fair enough. This can happen. But there is great lashback from radfems for anyone who doesn't toe the party line - see their attacks on thirdwave libfems - and from Marxists - see attacks on neoliberal social democrats - and from intersectionals - see attacks on everyone else. https://twitter.com/EmilyVicendese/status/983332568761171968 …
Well, no. Neither is that suggested by "attacks" and "lashback." This is verbal. By "attacks" and "lashback", I mean highly aggressive, condemnatory attacks on the character of people who disagree with them. Not 'I disagree with you about trans identity because...'
-
-
But "You are a handmaiden supporting the patriarchy in the form of "transwomen." You are a misogynist and MRA." Meanwhile, intersectionals, "You are a bigot denying trans people's rights to exist. You are a misogynist and TERF. Both said to me too. I've had to mute hundreds.
-
You’re right that you do get a lot of inflamed rhetoric, especially in internet based “discussions”. I agree it’s generally unhelpful (unless of course your goal is merely to score points against the other side and virtue signal to your comrades as opposed to advance discussion).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.