Objecting to being prevented from speaking to people who want to hear you is *not* the Fallacy of Demanding to be Heard. That fallacy is when you insist you have the right to be heard by people who *don't* want to hear you.https://twitter.com/jarodcampbell1/status/983338389238898689 …
-
-
I suspect you would admit that there *are* fiddly grey areas to this sort of distinction? What about folk who aren't (yet) aware of the group/message? Of proclaiming a message on a street corner, or a billboard advert? What're the modern equivalents?
-
How do you categorise proselytising?
-
Well, I'm not sure that has its own category but for our purposes here, say what you want but don't force anyone to listen to you. You can proclaim a message on a street corner but you can't make people stay and listen to it.
-
Cool. The reason I suggest there are shades of grey involved, is because I doubt it's clear what counts as fair game "street corner" in various contexts.
-
I think it has to be somewhere someone can get away from.
-
Yeah, agreed. I wonder if e.g. Twitter lacks a meaningful "street corner" on which folk can "proselytise" (street preaching still *feels* like expression after all). Perhaps explains some of the attention-seeking; after all where *else* is there here except someone's timeline?
-
I'm not sure what you mean. People should be able to say whatever they want on Twitter. Other people have the means not to listen to them.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Like I said on the other thread. The event was cancelled due to another panelist deciding they did not want to hear Rick's speech. It actually does fit this description.
-
If Rick demanded that he must hear him, yes. Otherwise, no.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So clear. So true. Such a useful tweet...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.