Yes, I get that but even if it were proven that being married made you more likely to create a stable, secure reproductive environment for offspring, why would this only be the case for the offspring of heterosexuals? https://twitter.com/DoctorHeadcrab/status/980923694984892418 …
I'm sorry. I dont know how this is relevant unless you think people are taking kids away from their good biological parents and giving them to same sex couples.
-
-
It become relevant when an adoption or foster agency has the choice of placing a child in a heterosexual married, heterosexual unmarried, same sex, single, etc. home. Should the agency show preferences and for what?
-
It’s also relevant to those so hostile to homosexuality they might want to take children away from a biological homosexual parent. What makes for a better environment for the child?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.