Yes, I get that but even if it were proven that being married made you more likely to create a stable, secure reproductive environment for offspring, why would this only be the case for the offspring of heterosexuals? https://twitter.com/DoctorHeadcrab/status/980923694984892418 …
How is it? No-one is taking kids from parents because they're stable and secure.
-
-
There’s the issue of where adoptive & foster children are placed. There’s also the issue of creating biological children of one parent, which is also a concern with single women, etc. I don’t personally see this as a show-stopper but can understand why others do.
-
Based on a hierarchy of better and worse thans, I can imagine many circumstances where kids would be better off with same sex parents than alternatives, so it depends on what the alternatives are.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.