Well, that wouldn't make a whole lot of sense if you live somewhere which already has them, obviously.
Surely you recognise that people can value things for other reasons than tradition? I married my husband to show my love and commitment to him. I don't think the state should privilege married couples over unmarried ones.
-
-
1. I do; it is beside the point. The value of marriage is not to support tradition. Marriage has become tradition because it has shown that it is a functional element in the smooth operation of a society aiming at eudaimonia. ->
-
Then why would you want to deny it to same sex couples?
-
Threading and timing has got me lost. What does this question follow? Can you quote a brief snippet for context?
-
If you think marriage is benefit for the smooth running of society, why deny it to same sex couples? Won't they do better in committed relationships? Won't their children benefit from their parents being married? (In your view?)
-
(Gimme a sec, I want to respond in order so that we can keep our ducks straight.)
-
I'm not really interested in arguing about same sex marriage any more. It's been done to death and the battle has mostly been won.
-
OK, fine. This is the first time I've engaged in it. To me, your positions are based on feelings, not rational consideration. You've left me unpersuaded. But if you want to end it, that's fine, I'll respect that.
-
You don't need to be persuaded. There is no rational reason for denying same sex couples the right to marry. It doesn't affect you in any way.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
just curious, what privilege's does the state give married couples over unmarried ones?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.