I absolutely know it's possible to see things like LGBT rights and reproductive freedom as society becoming less moral. I wouldn't bother arguing so much against that position if it wasn't.https://twitter.com/OldSaintRiot/status/980893110799499264 …
Well, that is what is meant by LGBT rights - making the rights of LGBT people the same as the rights of others. We have full equality here now. Before we had same sex marriage, that was a right that was lacking. Now it isn't.
-
-
1. I don't believe that marriage, per say, is a right that is/should be afforded to two people of the same sex. A right serves the purpose of permitting one to perform a duty, and in the case of marriage, the duty is to the well-being of offspring produced by the couple.
-
You don't have to believe that same sex couples should have the right to get married but this a right people who fight for LGBT rights do fight for. I don't define rights as serving the purpose of permitting one to perform a duty and offspring is not a duty of marriage.
-
Then you do not use the word "right," a legal term, the way that those who legislate, adjudicate and enforce the laws do. Offspring is not a duty of marriage, but duty to offspring is the purpose of marriage.
-
That should be changed then. Duty to offspring should be independent of whether their parents are married and whether they are the same sex or the opposite sex.
-
Why? Just a reminder that offspring means the product of sexual reproduction, not merely any child in the vicinity. I agree that offspring, and children in general should be cared for. But none of this addresses assigning traditional purpose-created legal rights to non-parents.
-
I don't care much about traditional purposes of marriage. That has changed a lot over time and space. Now it mostly signals a loving commitment which is why same sex couples want the same right to do it. And I think people have a duty to care for their adopted children too.
-
"I don't care much about traditional purposes of marriage." Then why have it at all? Why should the state (that's us) assign benefits of those who would claim it? Note that guardianship does not confer the benefits of inheritances, power of attorney, etc. between two guardians.
-
Surely you recognise that people can value things for other reasons than tradition? I married my husband to show my love and commitment to him. I don't think the state should privilege married couples over unmarried ones.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.