It is this perception of a gap that I wish to address. It seems it must exist because most people don't read this shit so can academia really be that influential? Compare to religion. Can religious ideas become culturally dominant when <1% of the population studied theology? Yes.https://twitter.com/Bugs_Meany/status/980820958972989440 …
-
-
OK, I am not going to write this book on Twitter. I am going to walk my dogs and get some work done. I need to go away for a few days again and focus.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think my point is that the nut of the issue is hidden inside of the statement: "initially ignored, but which evolved" its about the evolution of group-thinking, not narrow academic-origins of ideas Hoffer, basically https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_True_Believer …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.