Hmmm. "Using skepticism as an excuse not to believe women's stories." I'm afraid skepticism does require not believing anecdotes on the grounds of the speaker's identity. This is very basic skepticism. It really shouldn't be set aside in the service of a political position.https://twitter.com/tmamone/status/980766964401541121 …
-
Show this thread
-
And the problem with 'misogyny in the atheist movement is a systemic problem' is that this claim is not coming from 'women.' It's coming from ppl of all genders who adhere to SocJus views. This undermines its credibility. Misogyny is hatred of women not rejection of SocJus values
2 replies 8 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
I certainly agree with the idea of getting rid of leaders but this is an individual mentality thing. We never elected leaders & so can't sack them. One has to stop thinking in tribal terms of 'leaders' and instead have thinkers one respects but is not obliged to always agree with
4 replies 4 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
I don't like the idea of 'leaders' generally. It implies a wholesale giving over of one's judgement and values to an individual. Unless you're in a war or some kind of emergency situation where this is temporarily necessary, don't do that.
2 replies 5 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
The best alternative to selecting a leader and thinking & behaving the way they tell you is not to rely solely on your own judgement & assessment of everything. This is bad too. Instead have a number of thinkers you respect for good reason but who don't always agree w each other.
1 reply 3 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Then cherry-pick their ideas to your heart's content. "Cherry-picking" is often used as an accusation of inconsistency but, when done honestly & openly, it is just discernment.
1 reply 2 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
I will take Jonathan Haidt's moral foundations but decline his views on atheism. I'll have Peter Tatchell's attitude to universal human rights but leave his views on feminism. I'll go with Maryam Namazie's views on Islamism but go elsewhere for thinking statistically.
2 replies 2 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
I'm not kidding myself I'm achieving an unbiased view of the world with this tho. This whole process of selection and discernment is driven by my own values which change in the details but remain fairly consistent at the core. I think this is the best we can do as individuals tho
2 replies 1 retweet 26 likesShow this thread
Oh, and btw, you can only possibly consider secularism/atheism/skepticism/whatever to be dominated by white men if you completely ignore the existence of ex-Muslims which accusers, sadly, tend to be inclined to do.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.