I'm finding this conversation interesting, on a number of levels. I'd need a detailed definition of "far-right views" before I could join in a dialogue of whether it's "blindingly obvious" that they are wrong/don't have any substance.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/979764760009994241 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @annaellis_net
Could you suggest a far-right view which does have theoretical, ideological depth and complexity?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @annaellis_net
That of Ezra Pound? Or any number of modernist intellectuals who flirted with far right politics?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ianpacemain @annaellis_net
Oh? Have you encountered this? I haven't heard any of them from any far-rightists. We reach an impasse immediately and there is nothing of substance being offered like there is on the far-left..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @annaellis_net
There certainly was in the early twentieth century. Try Eliot, Knut Hamsun, Gabriel d’Annunzio, Gottfried Benn and others.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ianpacemain @annaellis_net
No, I realise that far-right scholarly views exist. My point is very much about current political debates right now and why I don't spend as much time combattng far-right views & Trumpism & populism. They're not calling on anything I can get teeth into.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ianpacemain
Personally I'm wary of conflating Trumpism, populism and the "far-right". For many, a vote for Trump was a vote against Clinton and/or "the establishment".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Don;t conflate them, then. I think they are distinct. To say that I am not getting anything of interest from them is not to say they are the same thing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.