No, we don't. We can base hypothesis on an assumption that it is but accept that it is provisional and continue trying to disprove it. Science cannot advance at all if you have faith that something is true. https://twitter.com/KantBreal/status/979338758955913217 …
It's not what I am criticising as faith. No problem with working assumptions only provisionally accepted and subject to revision on better evidence. When observations of the universe do not hold up, people abandon them. Evidence of the universe remains. Same is not true of God
-
-
Would love to discuss over tea rather Twitter. Have a great day!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We examine how and personally ascribe why. Causality was a continued problem, the potential of how nothing to something came about doesn't eradicate faith for why the how. There is no reason for existence, just is. Faith is the meaning to the is and desire for ought & what nxt
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.