Then I'm not criticising what you call faith. I am criticising commitment to a position without evidence. When faith is used synonymously with confidence or trust in something, it is a completely different thing. There are good and bad reasons to have trust in things.https://twitter.com/gm_palmer/status/979334798249402368 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
For frigging sure. A commitment to a position without *any* evidence is usually pretty bad (and since you're committed without knowing what it is you're wide open to manipulation).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gm_palmer
In religion, faith is explicitly a virtue and overcoming doubt and standing firm in your faith despite evidence against it is especially virtuous. We also get this virtuous feeling when we stand by things that are meaningful to us despite lack of evidence or evidence to contrary
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @gm_palmer
For me, this has mostly been people. I have stood by them and continued believing in them despite evidence that I shouldn't because they were important to me. Also, feminism. It took me a long time to accept the abundant evidence that it had gone off the rails.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
This wasn't simply being mistaken. I was morally motivated to believe against the evidence and felt that I was being a good and loyal person for doing so. 'I have faith in you no matter what anyone says.'
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.