”Universal Liberal” is confusing. I call myself a Pragmatic Libertarian and seem to have the same positions that you do.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/978951887662837761 …
No, not really. This is closely connected to confirmation bias and includes such things as insisting wage gaps exist in order to achieve goals of privileging women in employment. Very common in politics too.
-
-
Is that pragmatism? To me, that sounds like lying for political purposes. I guess I’ll have to avoid any epistemologists finding out about me, or they might be deceived. I mean, I’m prepared to shade the truth in the cause of freedom, but not be outright dishonest.
-
It's not dishonest in their terms because what is true is what works to achieve their goal.
@Intrinsic29 explains this better than me. -
I feel you are taking an epistemological concept and applying it in a political/ethical context.
-
I am simply pointing out misunderstanding I have experienced because of the two meanings both prevalent in current conversations. I completely accept the validity of your use of it and use it in the same way myself.
-
I’ve certainly learned from your comments. So how does “universal liberal” work as a description?
-
Traditional liberalism which treats everyone as an individual with the same right to access everything rather than dividing people into identity groups.
-
That is how I would understand classical liberalism. Unfortunately, as we both know, the term ”liberal” in common parlance means almost the exact opposite, being both collectivist and based around identity groups (along with being antithetical to freedom) :-(
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.