There is a kind of conservative who imagines that feminism is essentially 1970s lesbian separatism despite the fact that this essentially ended decades ago and the radical feminists, lesbian or not, are primary targets of the current dominant feminism - intersectionality.
No, it makes a bisexual. I'm certainly not denying that leading feminist academics are misandrist. I'm saying that political lesbianism is dead.
-
-
It does not make here a bisexual unless she identifies as a bisexual. Depending again on how you measure these things. Either way if you admit leading academic feminists are misandrist that is more damning than a conservative narrative that they are merely lesbian separatists.
-
No, I'm not going on self-identification here. A bisexual is someone who attracted to both sexes. Also, she does identify as bisexual. Well, yes. I have spent considerable time arguing about the misandry problem. It doesn't help to conflate this with lesbianism.
-
It confuses the issue and makes it easier to dismiss if feminists are being 'accused' of being lesbians which is morally neutral when what they are is misandrists which is a form of bigotry. It just looks homophobic and bigoted rather than addressing bigotry which actually exists
-
Pew polls show most conservatives accept gays. At this point I’d say LGBTQ are on the offensive in USA and homophobia isn’t a huge issue. whether Academics are lesbian separatist Redfems or not the underlying misandry has always been the larger threat.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.