There is a kind of conservative who imagines that feminism is essentially 1970s lesbian separatism despite the fact that this essentially ended decades ago and the radical feminists, lesbian or not, are primary targets of the current dominant feminism - intersectionality.
-
-
What is your metric for influence? Citations? The number of hits? I refer you to
@RealPeerReview for false scientometrics. Academic =/=pop. Those who control the academic fem conferences control the dominant narratives. Paglia and Sommers have discussed this for decades now. -
I doubt they're saying its the radfem lesbian separatists. They know it's the intersectionals.
-
But, if I am wrong, and radfem political lesbians are still acceptable at feminist conferences in a way they are not in academia, I will be glad to be corrected on this.
-
Parsing the definitions may be impossible as few like to be completely boxed in. Lesbianic itself is subjective. Anyone can identify as LG and the neural imaging studies show they are bisexual, which have always been the most marginalized group of the LGBTQ "alliance".
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.