There is a kind of conservative who imagines that feminism is essentially 1970s lesbian separatism despite the fact that this essentially ended decades ago and the radical feminists, lesbian or not, are primary targets of the current dominant feminism - intersectionality.
I don't know if she's a misandrist. I looked for evidence of her being a lesbian. The political lesbianism of the 2nd wave is very different to the queer identity of today.
-
-
Her pinned tweet for years was "you call me a misandrist like it's a bad thing" I called her on it. Guess who joined in the male bashing. https://twitter.com/aodespair/status/664179225243557888 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
OK, but I'm not arguing that misandry is not a major thing. I am saying, for the last time, that political lesbian separatism has moved on to critical race theory, queer theory and intersectionality now and the old radfems, lesbian or not, are being no-platformed and vilified.
-
Ah. Yeah that gets complicated and quantifying it would require agreeing on metrics of speech and influence. I'll agree with you that intersectionality is running its course and displacing many radfems online. LGBTQ alliances have always been forced and fractious though.
-
They are not interested in the G, contemptuous of the B, usually declare the T to be a patriarchal conspiracy to steal women's identity and are ambiguous on the Q.
-
It’s almost as if Lesbians are only interested in other women who are also only interested in other women. Fancy that.
-
I wasn't talking about sexually. I was talking about the politics of the political lesbian separatists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.