Yes. I go after the extremists whilst explicitly supporting or finding common ground with people who may use these terms but mean them in a way consistent with universal liberalism. I may still argue with them a bit tho where we differ.https://twitter.com/corymassimino/status/978309075099320322 …
I do need words to criticise the value systems and epistemologies I need to criticise. If other people are using 'intersectional' in a completely different way to what Crenshaw meant, I can't stop using it the right way to placate them. I need to talk about it.
-
-
Why don't you think the usage of the concepts are more nuanced than these strict binaries? Again, I've pointed you to literature that employs idpol and intersectionality in liberal ways. And they aren't just making up wholly new definitions. That's the argument of a sectarian!
-
There will always be nuance to be found in individuals. I argue against sets of ideas and set out why. What do you suggest I do? Stop saying 'intersectionality' because of people who use it but are actually advocating universal liberalism?
-
No, merely acknowledge that you don't have to be promoting one or the other and that some sets of ideas try to reconcile them.
-
But I am promoting universal liberalism. All the way. If this is what you mean by 'sectarian', I am one.
-
What? No. I, too, endorse universal liberalism. I'm saying it doesn't help promote universal liberalism to be definitional sectarians. To define people who use idpol and intersectionality out of universal liberalism by definition.
-
They define themselves out of it! They are in opposition to it! We can find common ground on other things and share an aim of gender/racial/LGBT equality but you can't favour both universalism and identity politics.
-
They only define themselves out of it according to your definitions! So that doesn't mean much. What is your explanation for those who do explicitly reconcile universal liberalism and idpol, like the article I linked before? Are they just conceptually confused?
-
I didn't define the terms! I just reread the article. It thinks BLM is a good approach despite much evidence of it increasing racial tensions and being highly unethical. Yes, people who think you can reconcile universality with identity politics are conceptually confused.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.