It reminds me of crazily intricate early modern court etiquette about the order in which the nobility should enter the dining room. Who took precedence over whom. Seeding. It broke down to the level of the individual but still fully embedded in social status so not individualism.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed. One of the most insidious things about intersectionality is it removes the individual and leaves only the boxes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How could a theory championing morally irrelevant, immutable, and inherited characteristics as defining a person's identity ever lead to individualism?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hey, they truly believe that all relations are based on power dynamics. And that's how they want to keep it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup, the category with the least members is rated more highly, each individual will not be a separate category but individuals as a whole are 1 category.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.