What’s this about?
-
-
-
He'd ban any speech which described certain groups as lesser.
-
Banning “hate speech” is dumb, thought policing is tyranny. If you’re going to ban speech at least try to be reasonable with the criteria by which the standard is set. ‘Hate’ & ‘offence’ are not good enough, ‘inciting violence’ & ‘clear and present danger’ are better standards.
-
It also feeds into their sense of grievance and victimhood. Not a good idea.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps if you studied the texts you wouldn't appear so limited. Reciting a middle ages law describing how someone should be hanged drawn and quartered is not encouraging violence now nor is reading shit in a 'holy' book unless it is encouraging violence NOW. It's simple. Really.
-
That's what I do! Study the texts. But we've already agreed that inciting violence should remain a crime. In this case, someone taught a dog a Nazi salute.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hopefully they will at least enforce it evenly if they are going down this road. But watch them not do shit about jihadi mosques...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.