Stop spreading utter crap. The replication paper itself had flaws & a 2nd team of researchers showed there isn't a replication crisis. Pls share this around to your followers a few times to counter act the misinformation & bad science you're pushing.https://youtu.be/h2GDZvGYPWg
-
-
Replying to @KWintie @GodDoesnt and
Lee Jussim Retweeted Lee Jussim
I disagree. I think the "crap" claim is about as wrong as scientifically possible (though not as wrong as PoMo/SoCo/intersectional theory, but that stuff is not science). I started a new thread linked below. Disagreement welcome, c'mon over.https://twitter.com/PsychRabble/status/976083464125640705 …
Lee Jussim added,
Lee Jussim @PsychRabbleRetweeting this to start a new thread on this topic over at my tw site. In original convo,@KWintie refers to as "crap" the idea that "the social sciences have huge work to do because of p-hacking and the replication crisis." She is wrong. Disagreement welcome and invited. https://twitter.com/KWintie/status/976013729035898880 …2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @PsychRabble @KWintie and
Could you explain to me what is wrong with intersectional theory?
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mariustalks @KWintie and
Not in 280, or even 560 chars
@safeortrue's series at Quillette would be an excellent start: http://ow.ly/CJNV30j3fNh by@GodDoesnt: http://ow.ly/IP4Y30j3fWY Almost anything by@HPluckrose:http://ow.ly/gCmy30j3gbi3 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @PsychRabble @KWintie and
But for my understanding, when you say that intersectionality is wrong, do you mean that the very basic premise, which I would summarise as "people face different problems in regards to different sets of groups they belong to", is wrong or something more specific?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mariustalks @PsychRabble and
This is what I mean.https://areomagazine.com/2017/02/15/the-problem-with-intersectional-feminism/ …
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @mariustalks and
Closing paragraph: 'Until intersectionality respects diversity of ideas as well as of identity ....' Yeah, ideologies can't respect things. Only people can. Why can't some people tell the difference between concepts and beings?
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @KWintie @HPluckrose and
Actually, you are wrong. Marcuse, whose neo-Marxist ideas infuse intersectionality explicitly argued for intolerance of intolerance, in which the 2nd intolerance refers to any person or idea to the right of socialism. Yes, ideas/ologies can be intolerant. In practice, many are.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @PsychRabble @HPluckrose and
No, I am not wrong since you cited a PERSON whose thoughts you quote. You're citing that person's ideas about an ideology. So no, ideologies can't 'be intolerant' since ideologies can't act
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I am muting this silly attempt at derailment.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.