-
-
Boy, that's obnoxious. Did you even read it? Like your article settled the debate right?
-
I'm sorry! It was just sincere. I'm not interested in abstraction. I read the first one. I am not part of any philosophical debate about abstraction and Jordan Peterson.
-
There are 3 articles on Peterson. It's about much more than abstraction. Open your mind. The last one isn't even about abstraction, it's just the backdrop. It's about metamodernism, which you've talked about. You wrote this, so you're part of the debate.https://areomagazine.com/2018/01/29/the-guru-appeal-of-jordan-peterson-in-our-post-everything-world/ …
-
You really can't force people to find your approach interesting. I'm afraid I don't. Other people might. Show them. Try a little more humility. No, I did not write that and even if I did, it would not obligate me to engage your tangentially related ideas on the matter.
-
Okay, fixing the author. I'm not forcing anything on you. I'm saying you're not looking, so you don't understand my approach. And no, it wouldn't oblige you to do anything, but you are a publisher, so act like it. There is more than Peterson anywayhttps://medium.com/the-abs-tract-organization …
-
Send me something as an editor & I'll give it my full attention but, in my own life, I have my own areas of interest and this is not it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.