Seems like a fairly civil reply. You can't demand people to find you worthy of their time and effort.
-
-
"privilege preserving epistemic pushback"? This is the fancy shmancy version of sticking one's fingers in one's ears and say "lalala, can't hear you."
-
had a bit of fun with that. To use freely against POMO rhetoric.pic.twitter.com/dr18TeqbJm
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I took part in a conference in Prague 2016 which successfully brought together diff disciplines to discuss family violence. There was a womens studies academic there. I would say it was effective in creating dialogue. Organised by http://Inter-Disciplinary.Net
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This may be the most hilariously self contradictory statement that won't be obvious to a 'believer' I've ever read. Put it in the box with how "anti-racism" is used and store it in the attic never to be seen again.
-
Can't we just use "truth speakers"? Oh, that gives the ideas more merit, bollocks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good point. It would be good to clarify whether they are talking about this specific instance or dialogue in general.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.