Did you? I hadn't thought about it this way and it clarified a lot for me. It's not worth it for you if you didn't enjoy it. I did because it has layers and there's more than can be simply expressed.
-
-
Replying to @DurinnMcFurren @HenstockStephen
I think it is suitable for a very niche readership. The people who do see what it is doing and how on a theoretical and literary level *really* love it but most people who just want to know what it is talking about do not.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DurinnMcFurren @HenstockStephen
Yes, it could be done in way fewer words and much more clearly and directly and he can do that. We've published things by him before where he has. I'd just like to have access to this version too. It's hard to explain why I was so delighted by it.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DurinnMcFurren @HenstockStephen
Yes, there is that but it's not just a parody. It takes what is good and pleasurable - the flexibility and expansive meaning and just the whole feel of it - adds a distinct literary quality and puts it to the service of reason & precision. It's wonderful.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I'm not terribly keen on postmodern art, film, literature, tbh, but I do like the language. I don't think you would tho under any circumstances. You have the kind of mind this would not appeal to. And that is fine. This is an aesthetic thing. Neutral. No right answers.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.