Tweeps! This is the one you absolutely must read! It explains so much and I will be quoting it lots. It needs reading slowly and with full concentration but is clear and well...right.https://twitter.com/AreoMagazine/status/972681293405106176 …
But wrong. Nothing anti scientific here. They were fine with poetic language.
-
-
Not anti-scientific, no; but very obscurantist. The sort of language Dawkins holds up to ridicule in his review of their work.
-
Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree. I loved the language. It means precisely what It says tho its unfamiliar to some. No need for any condemnation of it. Ppl can persevere or not.
-
I get you; it's just as I said before, I have an instinctive and deep-seated dislike of such prose due to bitter experience with it.
-
It seems you are not alone. I will enjoy such writing in private in future.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Yeah - like I said in another tweet, the points I agree with, but I hated the way it was written. That said; it was perfectly targeted at the people who do use such language in the control-left.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.