Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
HPluckrose's profile
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
Helen Pluckrose
@HPluckrose

Tweets

Helen Pluckrose

@HPluckrose

Editor @AreoMagazine Secular, liberal humanist. Mother. Doglover. Writing book about epistemology & ethics on the academic left Helen.pluckrose@areomagazine.com

London.
areomagazine.com/author/hpluckr…
Joined August 2011

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Patrick Lee Miller‏ @Plato4Now Mar 8
      Replying to @disitinerant @daveweeden and

      Being fully rational requires taking stock of the whole. To focus exclusively on good (or bad) is to make a partial judgment. To deny the Enlightenment's responsibility for anything bad after, say, 1750 while giving it credit for everything good thereafter is a double standard.

      4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
      Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
      Replying to @Plato4Now @disitinerant and

      One of the good things about the Enlightenment was the process that began where we test things and recognise the bad as bad and weed it out. We'll never get things perfect but this is the only way to get better.

      2:04 PM - 8 Mar 2018
      • 3 Likes
      • AML Steen Andersen Raymond McCue 💗⚤💜⚣💙, 🏳️‍🌈
      4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Patrick Lee Miller‏ @Plato4Now Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @disitinerant and

          1/ That brings us round to the original topic of the thread: whether empirical science can offer sound prescriptions in addition to sound descriptions. If by “Enlightenment” you mean empirical science (already a slippery association), we have to be careful.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @Plato4Now @disitinerant and

          Yes, we wrote 10,000 words on this where we avoided using 'Enlightenment' but spoke of the general intellectual and cultural shifts and developments of the modern period - science, reason, secularism, liberal democracy - under umbrella of 'modernity.'

          3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        4. The Dissenter‏ @TheDissenterYT Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @Plato4Now and

          But even the ideas that are attributed to the Enlightenment are much more ancient than the Enlightenment itself. Philosophically and historically, it doesn't make any sense to place their origins at that point.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @TheDissenterYT @Plato4Now and

          Don't then? I don't think anyone claims this, do they? This was why we needed 10,000 words. It's well known that the Enlightenment closely connected to the Renaissance which was heavily informed by Ancient Greece. This might be of interest academically but is not really point.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        6. The Dissenter‏ @TheDissenterYT Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @Plato4Now and

          Why not? It's extremely important in tracing the basis to our moral values.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @TheDissenterYT @Plato4Now and

          Go for it. I am also interested in this. The Renaissance is my period of study. However, the history of ideas found in the Enlightenment need not inform our every moral decision now.

          3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. The Dissenter‏ @TheDissenterYT Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @Plato4Now and

          Yes, but if you say that things like reason, individualism, progress, science, and so on, inform our current values, then what I answer is that those ideas are much more ancient than the Enlightenment.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @TheDissenterYT @Plato4Now and

          OK, you can answer that if you think it adds anything. Then we can continue discussing the claim that things like reason, individualism, progress, science, and so on, inform our current values?

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        10. 6 more replies
        1. New conversation
        2. The Dissenter‏ @TheDissenterYT Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @Plato4Now and

          And who tried to negate that? It's just that it's very important to keep a strong moral sense, and there are scientists that believe too much that science can do that by itself.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @TheDissenterYT @Plato4Now and

          Well, lots of people negate it, obv. They focus on the fact that bad things happened during and following the Enlightenment & argue that it was a bad development. They ignore fact that it's a project of self-correction and improvement.

          2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @TheDissenterYT and

          Possibly there are scientists who believe science can replace the discussion and development of ethics but if so, they're few and far between. The Enlightenment project - what Rauch calls 'liberal science' - focuses strongly on the free exchange of ideas for moral advancement.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. The Dissenter‏ @TheDissenterYT Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @Plato4Now and

          Yeah, but the discussion here was precisely around that. Some people here defended that science by itself can determine what are the correct moral values to hold.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @TheDissenterYT @Plato4Now and

          OK, fair enough. Fortunately, they're widely recognised as loons and most people recognise that the universe doesn't care if we torture each other to extinction. We have to decide what matters tho empathy, compassion, justice etc are innate & guide this.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. The Dissenter‏ @TheDissenterYT Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @Plato4Now and

          We already covered empathy here. Empathy doesn't allow you to expand a more principle to people who don't belong to your group. Paul Bloom covered that in his recent book, Against Empathy.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @TheDissenterYT @Plato4Now and

          There can certainly be many limitations on empathy but this doesn't change that we have an innate sense of it & it informs our moral sense. 'Don't do things to other people that you wouldn't like done to you' comes up over & over again in various cultures as a moral premise.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Patrick Lee Miller‏ @Plato4Now Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @disitinerant and

          3/ And it can’t make sense of itself, by answering questions like “what is truth,” “what is knowledge,” “what is being,” and so on. To make sense of her science—as such, let alone in the scheme of wider life—the scientist must go beyond science. As we’re doing here.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Ben Sixsmith‏ @BDSixsmith Mar 8
          Replying to @Plato4Now @HPluckrose and

          Just wanted to add that even if there could be an objective definition of "wellbeing" it would not imply, in and of itself, that we are obligated to care about other people's.

          3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @BDSixsmith @Plato4Now and

          No, you'd need to add some neuroscience to show that we can't help that if neurologically typical. It's part of being a social species. It doesn't matter on a broader scale what we do. Humanity generally only matters to humanity. And maybe dogs. ;-)

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        5. Ben Sixsmith‏ @BDSixsmith Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @Plato4Now and

          Heh. We certainly care about those close to us. But caring about people people we have never met is a very modern and far from universal trend.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @BDSixsmith @Plato4Now and

          Yes, this doesn't detract from the fact that empathy strongly informs Y drives our moral sense as social mammals. Those who don't have empathy, eg psychopaths, very often don't have morality or have difficulty with it.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        7. Ben Sixsmith‏ @BDSixsmith Mar 8
          Replying to @HPluckrose @Plato4Now and

          Sure, I agree. My point (which I perhaps could have made better earlier) is that universalist ethics defy human nature and demand moral arguments that transcend scientific facts.

          1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
        8. Helen Pluckrose‏ @HPluckrose Mar 8
          Replying to @BDSixsmith @Plato4Now and

          This is still part of the response to the hypothetical scientist who doesn't know this? It seems like everyone in the conversation knows this.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        9. 6 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info